Leftist media Marxist agenda starting to rot from the top.

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Thursday, June 5, 2003
Disgraced Editors of New York Times Quit

New York Times Executive Editor Howell Raines and Managing Editor Gerald Boyd, caught up in the paper's recent scandals, have resigned, the corporation said today.

"This is a day that breaks my heart," Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. told employees this morning.



'Mean-Spirited'

Even before getting caught up in the uproar over the publishing of fictional dispatches written by underqualified reporter Jayson Blair, the resignation of reporter Rick Bragg and the dishonesty of columnist Maureen Dowd, Raines had been a controversial figure for his autocratic, morale-crushing behavior and leftist bias at the world's most powerful newspaper. An analyst on Fox News Channel this morning described his reign as "mean-spirited."

Raines' persecution of the private membership policies of Augusta National Golf Club, for example, bordered on monomania until his own internal problems distracted him.

'Inaccessible and Arrogant'

"You view me as inaccessible and arrogant," Raines told staffers at a meeting May 14. "You believe the newsroom is too hierarchical, that my ideas get acted on and others get ignored. I heard that you were convinced there's a star system that singles out my favorites for elevation."


Eric Burns, Fox News' media analyst and host of Fox News Watch, said there were two possible reasons for the resignations: the "horrible scope of the Blair scandal that was abetted by Boyd and Raines," and because both editors vehemently denied that their resignations were necessary to wipe the slate clean.

"It's almost certain when you're vehement enough, the opposite will happen," Burns said.


The Times announced that 66-year-old Joseph Lelyveld, former executive editor, would fill in for Raines.

"Howell and Gerald have tendered their resignations, and I have accepted them with sadness based on what we believe is best for The Times," Sulzberger stated. "They have made enormous contributions during their tenure, including an extraordinary seven Pulitzer Prizes in 2002 and another this year. I appreciate all of their efforts in continuing the legacy of our great newspaper.

'Highest Standards of Integrity'!

"I am grateful to Joe Lelyveld, an editor of superb talents and outstanding accomplishments, for his willingness to provide strong journalistic leadership as we select new executive and managing editors. While the past few weeks have been difficult, we remain steadfast in our commitment to our employees, our readers and our advertisers to produce the best newspaper we can by adhering to the highest standards of integrity and journalism."

Raines, 60, was promoted from editor of the Times' leftist editorial page to executive editor in 2001. This morning, according to the paper, he told his former colleagues, "Remember, when a great story breaks out, go like hell."

Ignorant Even of Themselves

On its Web site today, the Times' article about the resignations admitted a curious ignorance about events in its own newsroom: "While Mr. Raines had tried hard in recent days to win over some of his biggest internal critics, at dinners and in private conversation, it was not immediately clear this morning why that effort had come to an abrupt end."



Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:


Corporate Scandals
Media Bias
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
Are you braindead or something patriot, executive editors or the times are "Leftist media Marxists"? Are you for real? What's next BBC a quasi covert guerilla mao marxist news agency, CNN a radical, anarchist collective?

A marxist agenda? Have you even realised that China and former USSR are not even marxist now-a-days.

Do you know what marxism means? Have you even bothered reading a few paragraphs on its main premises. Can you even mention just one, just a single one of them?

What a nitwit...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
NYTimes,cbs,cnn,abc,nbc,bbc,.
Are firm supporters any leftist agenda that associates with the definition below..including affirmitive action(see Jason Blair), redistribution of wealth, the belief of class warfare, ommission of truth,distortion of facts,big goverment, big unions, a complete disdain for christian beliefs,or conservative movments,ie:false claims or ommited fact regarding Iraq war.

Examples:NYTimes editors last year wrote and covered some 32 articles on addmissions of womans golf in Augusta Georgia (who gives a fxck but the lesbians) when the time came to protest during the Masters 40 people showed up, 20 of them were from the above news sources.Isn't that using a lot of resources for not pushing a social agenda?
This week:How many storys were there on Isreal and Palastine getting together because of Bush?
Not half as many as hillary klintons ghost written book.

Fact:Around 85% of the journalist from these news sources,admit to be liberals or registerd democrats.

Marxism: NOUN: The political and economic philosophy of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from bourgeois oppression under capitalism to a socialist and ultimately classless society.

Wake the fxck up before you call me a nit wit, asshole.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,497
Tokens
I forget who said it, but the day the New York Times replaces its "Business" scetion with a "Labor" section is the day it is a Marxist newspaper.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
"redistribution of wealth": That's hardly leftist, most conservatives believe in that too fyi, otherwise i would be hard for say general electric to sell their cars say to the lower middle classes if there was only upward concentration of funds, and hence the economy would plunder, long time capitalist premise. In any case, have these mainstream media ever reported a need for higher taxes for the rich and less for the poor, obviously not. Get real, ted turner would like to see the average joe have as much money in his pocket to buy his tv, watch his channel and pay for the ads, but no more no less.

"the belief of class warfare": Yeah, you get all sorts of discussions on the times and bbc about guerilla warfare of the classes, last week i believe they had a 6 hour documentary titled "masses against the classes"....

"ommission of truth": Yeah, that's definately emblematic of marxism, so i guess you could call em marxist.

"distortion of facts": another marxist premise.

"big goverment, big unions": Esp. cnn, they got a union daily section, where union members question employers policies, with workers union songs et al.

"A complete disdain for christian beliefs,or conservative movements": It seems you are equating conservativism with christianity...

Read entropy's post about hansen's stupidity in another thread to get a good self portrait.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
redistribution of wealth": That's hardly leftist, most conservatives believe in that too fyi, otherwise i would be hard for say general electric to sell their cars say to the lower middle classes if there was only upward concentration of funds, and hence the economy would plunder, long time capitalist premise.

Market place sets the price and demand for GM products...and God for bid competition..(A poisoned concept for both Marxist and the NYTimes)
"In any case, have these mainstream media ever reported a need for higher taxes for the rich and less for the poor, obviously not. Get real, ted turner would like to see the average joe have as much money in his pocket to buy his tv, watch his channel and pay for the ads, but no more no less."
Higher taxes for the rich is to give to the "poor" is redistribution of wealth.
The media is constantly railing against Bush tax cuts...When the fxckin fools don't realize that the less goverment spending means more money in the economy...More money in the economy means a rising tide lifts ALL boats.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
there's very little competition in the car market...

If you think the playing ground is fair, try making your own model and going up against GM or Chysler.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
"A rising tide lifts all boats."

But this isn't a rise in the tide, but rather in the foam that sits on the TOP.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
The economy has made the rich wealthy, no?

Wouldn't you pay more being that you owe more to the system that put you in that position?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
"and God for bid competition..(A poisoned concept for both Marxist and the NYTimes"

yo, patriot,
marsububu.gif
fuck2.gif
fuck2.gif
fuck2.gif
,

you are supremely ignorant keep on...

marsububu.gif
suomi.gif
1039912785.gif
1053174822.gif
.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
"More money in the economy means a rising tide lifts ALL boats."

i ve heard that from all conservative circles, what a dumbass thing to say, what a falacious meaningless analogy, less goverment spending for what you dick? for wellfare mothers and the less fortunate and priviladged, for the sick and weak, it's great if it's for them people, but when it comes to haliburton and subsidising huge $$$ co.'s then the big $$ sharks want more government spending....

fool.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,149
Messages
13,564,574
Members
100,750
Latest member
giadungthienduyen
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com